November 27, 2019
On November 14th, 2019, USCIS published a proposed rule regarding the adjustment of certain immigration and naturalization fees. Overall, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to increase fees by a weighted average of 21%, including multiple new fees for nonimmigrant worker petitions and new fees for some benefit requests. The proposed rule would also limit the number of beneficiaries a petitioner could list on certain forms and would considerably increase the cost of applying for naturalization.
USCIS is a fee-funded government agency that uses fees to adjudicate applications and petitions. The proposed new fees would fund increased costs associated with Trump Administration policy goals for vetting applicants, petitioners, and beneficiaries. The rule would increase the cost of citizenship applications by over 80%, impacting as many as 9 million eligible applicants. The current USCIS filing fee to submit a Form N-400 Application for Naturalization is $640. The proposed rule would increase the fee to $1170. In the past, DHS set Form N-400 fees lower than its cost of adjudication in an effort to “promote naturalization and immigrant integration,” but will now increase fees under the direction of the Trump Administration.
Other proposed changes include:
For more details, see the complete proposed rule, which will undergo public comment until December 16, 2019. On December 10, 2019, a federal judge ruled that a lawsuit challenging these proposed changes had standing; the fee waiver process for naturalization will remain the same and will not be effected by the proposed changes.
February 11, 2020Judge Permanently Enjoins Trump Administration’s Attempt to Target International Students through Unlawful Presence Policy
On August 9, 2018, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued a Policy Memorandum that would have changed federal policy…More
January 31, 2020DHS to Implement New Public Charge Rule, Effective February 24, 2020
On January 27, 2020 the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to lift the injunction on the Trump Administration’s Inadmissibility on Public…More